I can't give you that. However, i do have a couple of science textbooks, one on palaeontology and another more general one, which do mention Piltdown Man before it was debunked, and they both say that it's very difficult to fit it into the picture that had already been built up, so if there are any, wouldn't it be interesting if they said something along those lines too? Maybe creationists should be careful what they wish for.
No comments:
Post a Comment